<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the new google rel-nofollow policy means for squidoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/</link>
	<description>Weblog from Katinka Hesselink on any lenses she may decide to make :)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:36:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: spirituality</title>
		<link>http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/comment-page-1/#comment-2086</link>
		<dc:creator>spirituality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spirituality.squidtop.com/?p=362#comment-2086</guid>
		<description>Thanks - but it only JUST hit the news. 

Taking rel-nofollow into account has been and is something to only start thinking about when you&#039;ve done everything else right (title tags, keywords in module titles, external links etc.). Still, combined with the disappearance of the related lenses feature - I AM, on my low ranking lenses, getting rid of most keywords - precisely because of pagerank leak. I have no idea yet whether it will help, and even if they do suddenly start ranking, whether it&#039;s because of this. Still, it&#039;s something to think about, when you&#039;ve tried everything else. 

I&#039;m sure you&#039;re not saying that it&#039;s a bad idea to make lensographies and promote them? After all - even leaving rel-nofollow aside - those are (if done right) topical links, whereas linking to a profile generally isn&#039;t. Except of course for those who have a different profile for each niche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; but it only JUST hit the news. </p>
<p>Taking rel-nofollow into account has been and is something to only start thinking about when you&#8217;ve done everything else right (title tags, keywords in module titles, external links etc.). Still, combined with the disappearance of the related lenses feature &#8211; I AM, on my low ranking lenses, getting rid of most keywords &#8211; precisely because of pagerank leak. I have no idea yet whether it will help, and even if they do suddenly start ranking, whether it&#8217;s because of this. Still, it&#8217;s something to think about, when you&#8217;ve tried everything else. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re not saying that it&#8217;s a bad idea to make lensographies and promote them? After all &#8211; even leaving rel-nofollow aside &#8211; those are (if done right) topical links, whereas linking to a profile generally isn&#8217;t. Except of course for those who have a different profile for each niche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefluffanutta</title>
		<link>http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/comment-page-1/#comment-2085</link>
		<dc:creator>thefluffanutta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spirituality.squidtop.com/?p=362#comment-2085</guid>
		<description>Google made this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/&quot;&gt;change to PageRank&lt;/a&gt; over a year ago. Squidoo and Wikipedia have been managing just fine, so I don&#039;t see this being a huge problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google made this <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/">change to PageRank</a> over a year ago. Squidoo and Wikipedia have been managing just fine, so I don&#8217;t see this being a huge problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj2008</title>
		<link>http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/comment-page-1/#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator>aj2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spirituality.squidtop.com/?p=362#comment-2047</guid>
		<description>I think I understand what you are saying Katinka &amp; like Teddi I always link to my Lensography these days and not my bio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I understand what you are saying Katinka &amp; like Teddi I always link to my Lensography these days and not my bio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katinka - spiritual</title>
		<link>http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/comment-page-1/#comment-2045</link>
		<dc:creator>katinka - spiritual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spirituality.squidtop.com/?p=362#comment-2045</guid>
		<description>Hi Brenda, 

Thanks. I just keep up with the SEO news - and this one&#039;s big. 

Something else I&#039;ve been doing today: getting rid of the dandyID module on most of my lenses. I had it in my template, so it was on all my new lenses made in the past few months. It was also on most of my lensographies. Now, as far as I&#039;m aware, it&#039;s only still on my where I&#039;m at online lens, where it fits the topic. Everywhere else it&#039;s gone for being a lensrank evaporator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brenda, </p>
<p>Thanks. I just keep up with the SEO news &#8211; and this one&#8217;s big. </p>
<p>Something else I&#8217;ve been doing today: getting rid of the dandyID module on most of my lenses. I had it in my template, so it was on all my new lenses made in the past few months. It was also on most of my lensographies. Now, as far as I&#8217;m aware, it&#8217;s only still on my where I&#8217;m at online lens, where it fits the topic. Everywhere else it&#8217;s gone for being a lensrank evaporator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treasures By Brenda</title>
		<link>http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/comment-page-1/#comment-2044</link>
		<dc:creator>Treasures By Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spirituality.squidtop.com/?p=362#comment-2044</guid>
		<description>Thank goodness we have you, Katinka! Some of this is &#039;over my head&#039; but I&#039;m getting the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank goodness we have you, Katinka! Some of this is &#8216;over my head&#8217; but I&#8217;m getting the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katinka - spiritual</title>
		<link>http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/comment-page-1/#comment-2043</link>
		<dc:creator>katinka - spiritual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spirituality.squidtop.com/?p=362#comment-2043</guid>
		<description>Hi Teddi - I think in the case of most giant squids it&#039;s best to go a step further: make specialized lensographies. Get everything about a certain topic together in one lensography. Though of course in your case - most of what you do is personal, so having only a personal lensography fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Teddi &#8211; I think in the case of most giant squids it&#8217;s best to go a step further: make specialized lensographies. Get everything about a certain topic together in one lensography. Though of course in your case &#8211; most of what you do is personal, so having only a personal lensography fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teddi  (Teddi14 on Squidoo)</title>
		<link>http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/comment-page-1/#comment-2041</link>
		<dc:creator>Teddi  (Teddi14 on Squidoo)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spirituality.squidtop.com/?p=362#comment-2041</guid>
		<description>Funny you say to not promote your squidoo bio but to promote your lensography.  I made that exact decision shortly after I made my lensography.   I just love when I do what someone who is wise recommends!!! I started to put my lensography link in my signature, profile links, and tweets etc.  I figured all of my lenses are listed there and then I get my lensography rank up at the same time.  I do not know how this is going to affect us at Squidoo in the long run so we will have to wait and see.  Excellent article.  I too am going to share it on tagfoot and twitter.

Teddi
http://www.squidoo.com/teddi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you say to not promote your squidoo bio but to promote your lensography.  I made that exact decision shortly after I made my lensography.   I just love when I do what someone who is wise recommends!!! I started to put my lensography link in my signature, profile links, and tweets etc.  I figured all of my lenses are listed there and then I get my lensography rank up at the same time.  I do not know how this is going to affect us at Squidoo in the long run so we will have to wait and see.  Excellent article.  I too am going to share it on tagfoot and twitter.</p>
<p>Teddi<br />
<a href="http://www.squidoo.com/teddi" >http://www.squidoo.com/teddi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katinka - spiritual</title>
		<link>http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/comment-page-1/#comment-2039</link>
		<dc:creator>katinka - spiritual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spirituality.squidtop.com/?p=362#comment-2039</guid>
		<description>Mulberry: thanks

Andrew: I don&#039;t like it either - it&#039;s not so much leeching as evaporating - simply disappearing. But google has the right to calculate lensrank any way they please. And this policy doesn&#039;t just effect squidoo, it negatively effects wikipedia too, and I can&#039;t say I&#039;m sorry about that. SEO&#039;s will have to rethink how to deal with this and in the meantime the advice is probably to either not link out at all, or to link out with followed links as much as possible. As I said - if it&#039;s a choice between pagerank disappearing or it going into the community, going into the community is probably best for everyone.

But you&#039;re right: everybody who favorites a lens ads a no-followed link to a lens. We&#039;ll just have to live with it. Community features have their own advantages after all. 

Ultimately they created the importance of links, and any thing they change in their policy about how to deal with them will effect web professionals. Because google is so powerful. But in this case the effect is mostly on those sites where rel nofollow is used - and those are the SEO&#039;d sites google probably worries most about anyhow. After all - they want to reward quality, not marketing or technological know how.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mulberry: thanks</p>
<p>Andrew: I don&#8217;t like it either &#8211; it&#8217;s not so much leeching as evaporating &#8211; simply disappearing. But google has the right to calculate lensrank any way they please. And this policy doesn&#8217;t just effect squidoo, it negatively effects wikipedia too, and I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m sorry about that. SEO&#8217;s will have to rethink how to deal with this and in the meantime the advice is probably to either not link out at all, or to link out with followed links as much as possible. As I said &#8211; if it&#8217;s a choice between pagerank disappearing or it going into the community, going into the community is probably best for everyone.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right: everybody who favorites a lens ads a no-followed link to a lens. We&#8217;ll just have to live with it. Community features have their own advantages after all. </p>
<p>Ultimately they created the importance of links, and any thing they change in their policy about how to deal with them will effect web professionals. Because google is so powerful. But in this case the effect is mostly on those sites where rel nofollow is used &#8211; and those are the SEO&#8217;d sites google probably worries most about anyhow. After all &#8211; they want to reward quality, not marketing or technological know how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/comment-page-1/#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spirituality.squidtop.com/?p=362#comment-2038</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. I don&#039;t like it though. Every Squidoo lens has a huge amount of nofollow links for bookmarking and so on. I can&#039;t believe they will now leech pagerank too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. I don&#8217;t like it though. Every Squidoo lens has a huge amount of nofollow links for bookmarking and so on. I can&#8217;t believe they will now leech pagerank too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mulberry</title>
		<link>http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/06/09/google-rel-nofollow-policy-squidoo/comment-page-1/#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator>mulberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spirituality.squidtop.com/?p=362#comment-2036</guid>
		<description>Good post, I&#039;m going to share this on Tagfoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, I&#8217;m going to share this on Tagfoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


